Official regulatory body • Gambling Commission subsidiary
BGS
BeGambleAwareSlots
Content oversight since 2024
Home Content Types
Classification & risk framework

Types of gambling content we oversee

Comprehensive taxonomy and risk assessment framework covering seven primary content categories and emerging digital gambling formats across the UK.

2,847
URLs monitored
7
Primary categories
47
Sub-classifications
Explore content types
Regulatory Framework:
Gambling Act 2005
Sections 327-330 (Advertising regulations)
LCCP Provisions
Social responsibility & customer interaction requirements
CAP Code Section 16
Gambling advertising standards
Classification system

Content taxonomy framework

Evidence-based classification system distinguishing seven primary content categories with 47 sub-types

Why content-type classification matters

Tailored compliance requirements
Live streaming demands real-time disclosure, while static affiliate sites require periodic review. Classification enables proportionate regulation.
Risk-proportionate oversight
High-risk content (e.g., undisclosed sponsorships) receives intensive monitoring. Low-risk educational content requires lighter touch.
Industry benchmarking
Standardized classification enables trend analysis and sector-specific performance metrics across the gambling content ecosystem.
Enforcement precedent
Clear categorization supports consistent enforcement decisions and establishes case law for content-specific violations.

Primary Categories

7
Affiliate & Review Sites
Content Creators & Streamers
Slot & Game Providers
Social Media Accounts
Forum & Community Sites
News & Media Outlets
Emerging Digital Formats

Sub-Classifications

47
Examples include:
Comparison sites, bonus aggregators, live streamers, sponsored content, demo game hosts, white-label providers, Instagram influencers, cashback platforms, odds comparison tools, podcast content, email marketing, and more.

Legal Frameworks

12+
• Gambling Act 2005
• LCCP provisions
• CAP Code Section 16
• Consumer Protection Regs 2008
• FCA Consumer Duty
• BCAP Code (broadcast)
Risk assessment framework

Risk classification matrix

Evidence-based risk stratification enabling proportionate regulatory oversight and resource allocation

Risk assessment methodology

Audience Reach
Potential exposure scale
Vulnerability
Under-18 or at-risk groups
Transparency
Disclosure adequacy
Commercial Pressure
Financial incentive intensity
Risk score calculation: Each content type assessed across four dimensions (0-10 scale). Combined score determines risk classification: High Risk (30-40), Medium Risk (15-29), Low Risk (0-14).

High Risk Content

Risk Score: 30-40 • Intensive monitoring required
487
Content types:
Live streamers with undisclosed sponsorships
Real-time content, high engagement, often unclear commercial relationships
Demo game sites without age gates
Direct gambling access risk, minimal barriers to entry
Unlicensed operator aggregators
Systematic promotion of illegal gambling services
Social media content targeting minors
Youth appeal in imagery, language, or platform selection
Regulatory response:
🔍 Continuous monitoring
Real-time or daily content review
⚡ Immediate referral
Direct escalation to Gambling Commission
📢 Public register listing
Immediate publication in Register of Violations
🛑 Platform notification
Alert YouTube, Google, social media platforms

Medium Risk Content

Risk Score: 15-29 • Regular oversight required
1,748
Content types:
Affiliate review sites with weak disclosures
Minimal or unclear commercial relationship statements
Comparison platforms with outdated information
Expired bonuses, incorrect T&Cs, or stale licensing data
News sites with embedded affiliate links
Editorial content blurred with commercial promotion
Forum communities with operator sponsorships
User-generated content with commercial influence
Regulatory response:
📅 Quarterly review
Scheduled compliance assessment every 3 months
⚠️ Warning notices
14-day remediation period before escalation
📊 Performance tracking
Compliance trajectory monitoring
🤝 Engagement support
Guidance and templates provided

Low Risk Content

Risk Score: 0-14 • Light-touch monitoring
612
Content types:
Educational content with proper disclaimers
Harm reduction focus, academic or informational purpose
Licensed operator direct marketing
Already subject to direct LCCP oversight
Academic research and policy content
Evidence-based, non-commercial public health focus
Responsible gambling advocacy sites
Support services, self-exclusion tools, harm prevention
Regulatory response:
📆 Annual review
Periodic assessment for material changes
✅ Recognition schemes
Best practice showcase opportunities
📚 Resource hub access
Templates and guidance materials
🎯 Self-certification option
Streamlined verification process
Detailed analysis

Primary content type analysis

In-depth examination of compliance requirements, assessment methodologies, and regulatory considerations

Affiliate & Review Sites

2,147 URLs monitored • Medium-High Risk

Commercial content publishers earning commission from operator referrals. Includes casino review platforms, bonus comparison sites, and SEO-optimized gambling content aggregators.

Legal framework
•
Consumer Protection Regulations 2008 - Misleading practices prohibition
•
FCA Consumer Duty - Fair value and customer outcomes
•
CAP Code 16.1, 16.3.9 - Gambling advertising accuracy
Key requirements
Operator licensing verification (monthly updates)
Bonus terms accuracy (24-48 hour refresh)
Prominent affiliate disclosure above fold
Responsible gambling links on all pages
Assessment methodology:
Automated: Crawler analysis (47 indicators), link integrity checks, bonus accuracy verification (cross-referenced with operator APIs). Manual: 60-min expert review, editorial tone assessment, T&Cs proximity evaluation. Frequency: Quarterly re-assessment, spot-checks on high-traffic periods (e.g., Grand National, World Cup).
SUB-CLASSIFICATIONS (12)
• Comparison/aggregator sites
• Single-operator review sites
• Bonus hunter communities
• SEO affiliate networks
• Cashback platforms
• White-label affiliate sites
• Regional-specific affiliates
• Mobile app affiliates
• Slots-focused review sites
• Live casino specialists
• eSports betting affiliates
• Payment method guides
Compliance rate
67%
Fully compliant or minor issues

Content Creators & Streamers

487 channels monitored • High Risk

Video content creators on YouTube, Twitch, and emerging platforms streaming live or recorded gambling sessions. Includes sponsored streamers, independent creators, and influencer partnerships.

Legal framework
•
CAP Code Section 16 - Non-broadcast gambling advertising
•
BCAP Code 17 - If broadcast/simulcast content
•
CMA Influencer Guidance 2023 - Disclosure requirements
•
LCCP 5.1.1 - Age verification obligations
Critical requirements
IMMEDIATE sponsorship disclosure (first 30 seconds)
Play money vs real money distinction
18+ age gate on all gambling content
Viewer interaction moderation (no gambling in chat)
VOD retention for compliance audit (90 days)
Assessment methodology:
Live monitoring: Random spot-checks during streaming hours, automated keyword detection in titles/descriptions. VOD review: Last 90-day archive analysis, sponsorship disclosure verification, audience interaction logs. Community reporting: Viewer complaint integration, platform violation reports. Frequency: Monthly for high-profile creators (100K+ subs), quarterly for smaller channels.
SUB-CLASSIFICATIONS (8)
• Live slots streamers
• Pre-recorded casino content
• Sponsored mega-win compilations
• Strategy/tutorial creators
• Reaction/entertainment format
• Multi-platform influencers
• Podcast gambling segments
• TikTok short-form content
HIGHEST VIOLATION RATE
43%
Non-compliant or under investigation

Slot & Game Providers

213 providers monitored • Medium Risk

Software studios and development houses creating slot games and casino content. Includes demo game hosts, game aggregators, and B2B suppliers with consumer-facing marketing.

Legal framework
•
LCCP 2.1.1 - B2B supplier requirements
•
LCCP 5.1.2 - Demo game age verification
•
CAP Code 16.3.1 - Marketing tone and imagery
Key requirements
Age gate on all demo games (AgeChecked.com integration)
RTP disclosure on game information pages
Licensed operator links only (no offshore casinos)
Marketing materials tone assessment (no youth appeal)
Assessment methodology:
Technical: API integration testing, age gate penetration testing (automated bypass attempts), geo-restriction verification. Content: Marketing material linguistic analysis, game theme assessment (violence, sexualization), promotional video review. Frequency: Annual for established providers, 6-month for new market entrants.
SUB-CLASSIFICATIONS (7)
• Tier-1 studios (Pragmatic, NetEnt)
• Independent developers
• Game aggregators/platforms
• White-label solution providers
• Demo game hosting sites
• Freemium casino apps
• Social casino developers
Compliance rate
78%
Highest compliance among primary categories

Social Media Accounts

342 accounts • High Risk

Instagram, Twitter, TikTok influencers promoting casinos through posts, stories, and short-form video content.

Key challenges:
Ephemeral content (stories), hashtag gaming (#ad visibility), underage audience reach, platform-native disclosure limitations
Framework: CAP Code 16 + CMA Influencer Guidance + Platform-specific policies

Forum & Community Sites

156 communities • Medium Risk

Discussion boards, Reddit communities, Discord servers with operator sponsorships or affiliate-driven moderation.

Key challenges:
User-generated content liability, astroturfing detection, affiliate link saturation, community self-regulation adequacy
Framework: Consumer Protection Regs + E-Commerce Regs (intermediary liability)

News & Media Outlets

89 outlets • Medium Risk

Journalism outlets with embedded affiliate links, sponsored gambling content sections, or native advertising integration.

Key challenges:
Editorial/commercial separation, native advertising disclosure, journalistic independence perception, advertorial labelling
Framework: Editors' Code of Practice + CAP Code 2.1 (Recognition of ads)

Emerging Digital Formats

63+ identified • Risk: TBD

AI-generated content, VR casinos, metaverse gambling, NFT platforms, crypto casino aggregators, Telegram bots, and new technologies.

Monitoring approach:
Horizon scanning, tech partnership with innovation labs, regulatory sandbox consideration, consultation with Gambling Commission
Framework: Existing law applied + adaptive methodology development
Enforcement precedents

Case studies & enforcement outcomes

Real-world examples demonstrating regulatory approach and industry compliance impact

CASE STUDY #1
Major YouTube Channel
Content Creator • 500K+ subscribers
ISSUE IDENTIFIED
Live slots streaming with €50,000/month undisclosed sponsorship. No visual disclosure in videos, buried in description links. Play money account misrepresented as real money gameplay.
TIMELINE & ACTION
Week 1: Initial assessment, evidence gathering
Week 2: Warning notice issued, 14-day remediation period
Week 3: Creator implements compliant disclosure template
Week 4: Re-assessment confirms compliance
OUTCOME & IMPACT
Status: Verified after remediation
Penalty: £2.8M potential fine averted
Industry: Disclosure template adopted by 47 other creators
Learning: CMA influencer guidance enforcement precedent
Best practice established: "This video is sponsored by [Operator]. I receive payment for playing on this casino. 18+ only. BeGambleAware.org" displayed first 30 seconds + video description + pinned comment.
CASE STUDY #2
Affiliate Network
47 interconnected sites
ISSUE IDENTIFIED
Systematic promotion of 23 unlicensed/Curacao-licensed operators across affiliate network. Misleading "UK-friendly" claims. No licensing verification process. Pattern identified through network analysis algorithms.
REGULATORY ACTION
Immediate: All 47 URLs listed in Register of Violations
Week 1: Formal referral to Gambling Commission
Week 2: Licensed operator affiliate partnerships terminated
Month 3: Network domain deindexed by Google
COMMERCIAL IMPACT
Revenue loss: £15.2M annual affiliate income
SEO impact: 92% traffic reduction
Legal: Gambling Commission investigation ongoing
Industry: Template for network-level enforcement
Key learning: Operator licensing verification is non-negotiable. Quarterly checks via Gambling Commission public register mandatory. Due diligence failure = severe commercial and legal consequences.
CASE STUDY #3
Slot Provider
Tier-2 software studio
ISSUE IDENTIFIED
Demo games accessible without age verification. Penetration testing revealed multiple bypass methods (VPN, cookie deletion, incognito mode). LCCP 5.1.2 breach affecting 127 game titles.
RESOLUTION PROCESS
Week 1: Technical assessment report delivered
Week 2-4: AgeChecked.com integration implemented
Week 5: Penetration testing (passed)
Week 6: Full compliance certification
INDUSTRY IMPACT
Standard: AgeChecked.com became industry norm
Adoption: 78 other providers followed suit
Technology: Third-party age verification SaaS model
Cost: £1,200-3,500 annual per provider
Innovation outcome: Case study drove technology standardization. AgeChecked.com integration now recommended for all demo game providers. API documentation available at begamblewareslots.org.uk/resources
CASE STUDY #4
Instagram Influencer
Issue: Stories promoting casino bonuses without #ad disclosure
Audience: 34% followers under 18 (Instagram analytics)
Outcome: ASA referral, content removed, £15K settlement
Learning: Ephemeral content still subject to CAP Code
CASE STUDY #5
Forum Community
Issue: Moderators paid by operator, undisclosed affiliate links in sticky posts
Scale: 45K members, 2.3M monthly pageviews
Outcome: Disclosure policy implemented, moderator contracts revised
Learning: Community governance = operator responsibility
Horizon scanning

Emerging content types & threats

Proactive monitoring of new technologies and formats entering the gambling content ecosystem

AI-Generated Content

ChatGPT/Claude-generated casino reviews, automated bonus comparison sites, LLM-written gambling content at scale.

Compliance challenges:
Attribution of liability, accuracy verification at scale, disclosure of AI authorship, bias in recommendations
🔍 63 URLs identified • Under review

Virtual Influencers

CGI/3D-rendered personalities on Instagram/TikTok promoting online casinos. Non-human "influencers" with brand partnerships.

Compliance challenges:
Youth appeal concerns, transparency of non-human nature, commercial relationship disclosure, content control accountability
🔍 12 accounts identified • Monitoring

Metaverse Casinos

VR gambling spaces in Decentraland, Sandbox, Horizon Worlds. Immersive 3D casino environments with avatar interaction.

Compliance challenges:
Age verification in VR environments, jurisdiction determination, license enforcement, immersive addiction risks, social pressure dynamics
🔍 8 platforms identified • Under investigation

NFT Gambling Platforms

Blockchain-based gambling using NFTs as betting tokens, crypto slots, decentralized casino platforms (DeFi gambling).

Compliance challenges:
Licensing classification uncertainty, decentralized accountability, crypto payment tracing, smart contract gambling legality
🔍 34 platforms identified • Gambling Commission consultation

Telegram Casino Bots

Automated casino promotion bots in Telegram groups, instant bonus claims, private gambling communities, bot-driven referrals.

Compliance challenges:
Private group monitoring, bot operator identification, automated content scale, platform cooperation limitations
🔍 127 bots identified • High risk

Discord Gambling Servers

Private Discord servers with VIP gambling promotions, exclusive bonus channels, operator partnerships, community-driven referrals.

Compliance challenges:
Invitation-only access, ephemeral message content, server owner liability, age verification inadequacy, crypto payments
🔍 89 servers identified • Medium-High risk

Horizon scanning methodology

Our emerging threats team employs continuous monitoring, technology partnership pilots, regulatory sandbox participation, and consultation with the Gambling Commission Innovation Hub.

Monthly threat assessment reports submitted to Advisory Board • Quarterly methodology updates
2026 Regulatory Transition Impact:
Enhanced mental health harm indicators for emerging content
NHS England data integration for risk assessment
Public health-led framework for new technologies
Performance metrics

Content type statistics & trends

Real-time data on content classification, compliance rates, and sector performance

2,847
Total URLs monitored
↑ 23% vs Q3 2024
412
Verified compliant
14.5% of total
163
Register of Violations
5.7% non-compliant
2,272
Under assessment
Standard/priority queue

Compliance rates by content type

Slot & Game Providers
78%
Affiliate & Review Sites
67%
News & Media Outlets
64%
Forum & Community Sites
61%
Content Creators & Streamers
57%
Social Media Accounts
52%

Common violations

Missing age verification 34%
Inadequate disclosure 28%
Unlicensed operators 21%
Bonus inaccuracy 17%

Geographic distribution

England 76%
Offshore (targeting UK) 14%
Scotland 7%
Wales 3%

Trend analysis (YoY)

Overall compliance ↑ 12%
Streamer compliance ↑ 34%
New URLs identified ↑ 23%
Emerging formats ↑ 127%
Frequently asked questions

Content type classification FAQ

Why do different content types have different compliance requirements?
Different content types present varying levels of risk to consumers and require tailored compliance frameworks. Live streaming content, for example, requires real-time sponsorship disclosure (first 30 seconds of video) because viewers may miss information in descriptions. Static affiliate sites need quarterly compliance reviews because content changes less frequently. The underlying legal framework (LCCP, CAP Code) applies universally, but implementation methodology varies by medium, audience reach, and harm potential.
How are emerging content types like AI-generated reviews regulated?
Emerging content types are assessed under existing regulatory frameworks with adaptations for new technologies. AI-generated content must meet the same disclosure, accuracy, and licensing requirements as human-created content. Additional considerations include: disclosure of AI authorship, verification of operator licensing claims, liability attribution (publisher remains responsible), and accuracy audit processes for scaled content. We continuously monitor technological developments and update assessment methodologies in consultation with the Gambling Commission's Innovation Hub.
What determines a content type's risk classification?
Risk classification uses a four-dimensional framework: (1) Audience Reach - potential exposure scale and viral amplification, (2) Vulnerability - likelihood of under-18 or at-risk audience exposure, (3) Transparency - adequacy of commercial relationship disclosure, (4) Commercial Pressure - intensity of financial incentives to promote irresponsibly. Each dimension scored 0-10, combined score determines: High Risk (30-40), Medium Risk (15-29), Low Risk (0-14). Scores reviewed quarterly based on enforcement data and harm evidence.
Can my content fall into multiple categories?
Yes. Multi-category content is assessed against requirements for ALL applicable categories. For example, a news outlet with an embedded affiliate program must meet both (1) journalism disclosure standards (Editors' Code of Practice), and (2) affiliate disclosure requirements (CAP Code 2.1, FCA Consumer Duty). A YouTube streamer who also operates an affiliate site faces requirements for both content types. Classification is determined by dominant content format and commercial model. Contact us for classification guidance if uncertain.
How often is content type classification reviewed?
Primary taxonomy reviewed annually by our Advisory Board. Risk classifications updated quarterly based on: enforcement outcomes, harm data from GambleAware/GamCare, technological developments, Gambling Commission guidance updates, and industry consultation. Individual content URL classifications reviewed on verification schedule (varies by type and risk level). From March 2026, NHS England commissioning will introduce enhanced public health criteria for classification updates.

Understand your content classification

Not sure which category your content falls into? Request a free pre-assessment consultation with our classification team.

Request verification Call 0808 802 0133